Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000473/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 9 February 2007.
1. The 1 st appellant was convicted after trial of two charges of ‘contravention of condition of massage establishment licence’ (Charges 1 and 3), contrary to section 13(1) of the Massage Establishments Ordinance, Cap. 266. He was sentenced to two concurrent terms of 3 months’ imprisonment. In the same trial, the 2 nd appellant was convicted of one charge of ‘managing a vice establishment’ (Charge 2), contrary to section 139(1)(b) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200 and was sentenced to 5 months