Ting James Henry v. HKSAR
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 60/2006 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 16 March 2007.
1. In the Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal, under the heading “Points of Law of Great and General Importance”, there are set out three questions indicating points of law of great and general importance which we certify and grant the applicant leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal to pursue. The applicant’s complaints of substantial and grave injustice can be pursued within those certified points. So there is no need to grant leave to appeal on the substantial and grave injustic
|
FAMC No. 60 of 2006 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 60 OF 2006 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 318 OF 2005) _____________________ Between:
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ Date of Hearing: 16 March 2007 Date of Determination: 16 March 2007 ______________________ DETERMINATION ______________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ: 1. In the Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal, under the heading “Points of Law of Great and General Importance”, there are set out three questions indicating points of law of great and general importance which we certify and grant the applicant leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal to pursue. The applicant’s complaints of substantial and grave injustice can be pursued within those certified points. So there is no need to grant leave to appeal on the substantial and grave injustice ground, and such leave is granted simply on the point of law ground.
Mr Neville Sarony SC, Ms Angel Lau and Mr Peter Pannu (instructed by Messrs Chong & Partners) for the applicant Mr I C McWalters SC (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent |
Further hearings and rulings under FAMC 60/2006