Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000024/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 March 2007.
1. The appellant, who was the 4 th defendant at his trial, appeals against both conviction and sentence. On 22 November 2006 the appellant was convicted after trial by Mr J.T. Glass of the single amended charge of possession of an offensive weapon, namely a hammer, being an instrument fit for unlawful purposes with the intent to use the same for an unlawful purpose, contrary to section 17 of the Summary Offences Ordinance, Cap. 228. The appellant, together with three co-defendants had stood tr
Cited by 1 case