Read the full judgment text of CACC 000579/1995 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 7 May 1996.
1. The applicant faced 25 charges of theft contrary to s.9 of the Theft Ordinance. I set out only one of those as it gives the flavour of them all. The first particularized that he on or about 19th day of March 1990, stole a chose in action, namely a debt in the sum of $13,000 owed by the Hua Chiao Commercial Bank Limited to Lee Tak Loong Co. Ltd., the property of the said Lee Tak Loong Co. Ltd. The others were similar but dealt with other entities such as Chung Fat Development Co. and Addi Lee