Read the full judgment text of CACV 000315/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 31 May 2007.
1. At the heart of the present appeals is a decision of the Obscene Articles Tribunal (“the OAT”), the 1st Respondent, made on 8 April 2003 classifying as obscene an article published by Three Weekly Limited (the Applicant) in the 2 November 2002 issue of Three Weekly magazine. The issues arising in the present appeal involve challenges to this decision based on the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance as well as challenges with regard to the reasoning and merits of the actual
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases