Esquire (Electronics) Ltd v. The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of FAMV 19/2007 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 1 June 2007 before Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ.
1. Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is sought under – and solely under – the “or otherwise” limb of s.22(1)(b) of the Court’s statute. It is well established that the granting of leave under this limb is an exceptional course. Having considered the arguments put forward for the purpose of seeking leave to appeal, we see no reasonable prospect of the Court of Appeal’s judgment being reversed. Leave to appeal is refused accordingly.
Outcome: Leave to appeal refused; costs awarded to the respondent.
Cited by 1 case
|
FAMV No. 19 of 2007 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 19 OF 2007 (CIVIL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 312 OF 2005) _____________________ Between:
_____________________ And Between:
(by original writ and order to carry on) _____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ Date of Hearing: 1 June 2007 Date of Determination: 1 June 2007 ______________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N ______________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ : 1. Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is sought under – and solely under – the “or otherwise” limb of s.22(1)(b) of the Court’s statute. It is well established that the granting of leave under this limb is an exceptional course. Having considered the arguments put forward for the purpose of seeking leave to appeal, we see no reasonable prospect of the Court of Appeal’s judgment being reversed. Leave to appeal is refused accordingly. 2. [Without opposition, costs were awarded to the respondent.]
Mr Martin Lee SC, Mr Paul Harris SC and Mr Newman Lam (instructed by Messrs Ho, Tse, Wai & Partners) for the applicant Mr John Jarvis QC, Mr Joseph Fok SC and Mr Eugene Fung (instructed by Messrs Johnson Stokes & Master) for the respondent |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under FAMV 19/2007