Chan Chun Hoo v. Waddington Ltd
Read the full judgment text of FAMV 16/2007 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 4 June 2007 before Bokhary PJ, Chan PJ, Ribeiro PJ.
1. We grant leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal under the “question of great general or public importance” limb of s.22(1)(b) of the Court’s statute, doing so in regard to the first two questions set out in para.10 of the applicant’s Notice of Motion but not in regard to the third question set out in that paragraph. In other words, the leave which we grant is confined to the “reflective loss” and “multiple derivative action” issues.
Outcome: Leave to appeal granted in part, limited to the reflective loss and multiple derivative action issues.
Cited by 53 cases
|
FAMV No. 16 of 2007 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 16 OF 2007 (CIVIL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 220 OF 2005) _____________________ Between:
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ Date of Hearing: 4 June 2007 Date of Determination: 4 June 2007 ______________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N ______________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ : 1. We grant leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal under the “question of great general or public importance” limb of s.22(1)(b) of the Court’s statute, doing so in regard to the first two questions set out in para.10 of the applicant’s Notice of Motion but not in regard to the third question set out in that paragraph. In other words, the leave which we grant is confined to the “reflective loss” and “multiple derivative action” issues.
Mr Victor Joffe QC, Mr Martin Lee SC and Mr Hectar Pun (instructed by Messrs Fairbairn Catley Low & Kong) for the applicant Mr Benjamin Yu SC and Miss Eva Sit (instructed by Messrs Kao, Lee & Yip) for the respondent |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under FAMV 16/2007