The Incorporated Owners of Million Fortune Industrial Centre v. Charter Favour Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of CACV 428/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 5 June 2007.

1. On 13 March 2007, we dismissed the 2 nd respondent’s appeal from the order of Kwan J who ordered that the company be wound up.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.CACV 428/2006
Court
Court of Appeal
Date05 Jun 2007
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 428/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 428 OF 2006

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCW NO. 472 OF 2006)

______________

BETWEEN

  THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF MILLION FORTUNE INDUSTRIAL CENTRE Petitioner
  and  
  CHARTER FAVOUR LIMITED 1st Respondent
  FINANCIAL SERVICES AND SYSTEMS LIMITED 2nd Respondent

______________

 

Before:  Hon Tang VP, Chu J and Lam J in Court

Date of Hearing: 5 June 2007

Date of Decision: 5 June 2007

_______________

D E C I S I O N

_______________

Hon Tang VP:

1.On 13 March 2007, we dismissed the 2nd respondent’s appeal from the order of Kwan J who ordered that the company be wound up.

2.This is the 2nd respondent’s application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.

3.I will not repeat the reasons given in the judgment of 13 March 2007.

4.It is sufficient for the present purpose to say that no question of great general or public importance is involved in this appeal, and there is no other reason why leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal should be granted.

5.The application is dismissed.

Hon Chu J:

6.I agree.

Hon Lam J:

7.I also agree.

8.I would like to add that at the beginning of this hearing, Mr Sui sought the dismissal of this application with costs reserved so that he can apply to the Court of Final Appeal for leave to appeal.

9.It is a matter for his client to consider whether they would like to apply to the Court of Final Appeal for leave to appeal but that should not prevent us from considering his application on the merit and we have considered this application on the merit.

10.I agree for reasons delivered by Tang VP that this application should be dismissed.

Hon Tang VP:

11.The application is dismissed with costs.

(Robert Tang)
Vice-President
 (Carlye Chu)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
(M. H. Lam)
Judge of the Court of First Instance

Mr Sui See Chun, instructed by Messrs Kwan & Chow, for the 2nd Respondent.

Mr Anthony Lo, instructed by Messrs Ho & Tam, for the Petitioner.