HKSAR v. Ho Kai Cheong
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 17 June 1999.
1. Section 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance provides that:
Cites 1 case
|
CACC000586A/1998 CACC586/98 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. CACC 586 OF 1998 (On Appeal From DCCC 1050 of 1998) __________________
___________________ Coram : Hon. Nazareth, Ag. CJHC, Stuart-Moore, V-P, & Mayo J.A. in Court Date of Hearing : 17 June 1999 Date of Judgment : 17 June 1999 ---------------------- D E C I S I O N ---------------------- Nazareth, Ag. CJHC (Giving the decision of the Court) 1. Section 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance provides that:
2. We are asked to certify:
3. As so formulated, we are satisfied that no point of law of great and general importance is disclosed. We, accordingly, refused to certify the point as one of great and general importance.
Representation: Mr. A. A. Bruce, S.C., and Miss Grace Chan, S.G.C., SADPP for Director of Public Prosecutions. Mr. Phillip Ross instructed by (D.L.A.) for the Applicant D3. |
Cases cited in this judgment