Johnson Stokes & Master (A Firm) v. Jackin Total Fulfilment Services Ltd and Another

HCA 304/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 304 OF 2007

_______________

BETWEEN

______________________

HCMP 736/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 736 OF 2007

_________________

________________

BETWEEN

____________

(Heard Together)

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Muttrie in Chambers

Dates of Hearing: 14-15 May 2007

Date of Judgment: 1 June 2007

______________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

______________________

1.Paragraph 2,  page 3:-

‘By summons dated 26 February 2007, JSM applies for summary judgment……….’ should be changed to ‘By amended summons dated 20 March 2007, JSM applies for summary judgment……….’

2.Paragraph 5, page 4:-

‘………., a firm of accountants who gave procession services to Jackin in the arbitration,……….’ should be changed to ‘…………., a firm of accountants who gave professional services to Jackin in the arbitration,……….’

3.Paragraph 10, page 5:-

‘………..the 1st affirmation of HH is that IBM wrongfully failed to follow Jackin’s instructions concerning discovery of documents,……….’ should be changed to  ‘………..the 1st affirmation of HH is that JSM wrongfully failed to follow Jackin’s instructions concerning discovery of documents,……….’

4.Paragraph 42, page 15:-

‘The effective date of the itemised bill is 26 April 2006, i.e. within one year.’ should be changed to  ‘The effective date of the itemised bill is 21 April 2006, i.e. within one year.’

5.Paragraph 55, page 18:-

‘(1)

There be final judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st defendant in terms of Items (a), (c), (d) and against the 2nd defendant in terms of Item (f) of the prayer of the Amended Statement of Claim and the costs of the action and the Order 14 summons to be taxed if not agreed; ‘ should be changed to:-There be final judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st defendant in terms of Items (a), (c), (d) and against the 2nd defendant in terms of Item (f) of the prayer of the Re-amended Statement of Claim and the costs of the action and the Order 14 summons to be taxed if not agreed; ‘

‘(1)

6.Paragraph 55, page 18:-

‘(2)	The Originating Summons be dismissed with costs in favour of the plaintiff to be taxed if not agreed;’ should be changed to ‘(2)  The Originating Summons be dismissed with costs in favour of JSM to be taxed if not agreed;’

Dated the 27^th day of June 2007