Read the full judgment text of HCA 000914/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 July 2007.
1. This is a claim by the members of a Chinese ancestral worshiping tso against the members of another Chinese ancestral worshipping tso. The 1 st Tso is called Kan Kung Cheung Tso (“Kung Cheung Tso”) and it was set up for worshiping one Kan Kung Cheung (“Kung Cheung”). The 2 nd Tso is called Kan Tak Chung Tso (“Tak Chung Tso”) and it was set up to worship one Kan Tak Chung (“Tak Chung”), the father of Kung Cheung. The members of Kung Cheung Tso claim that they have the right to participate i