Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001144/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 2 August 2007.
1. The appellant was convicted after trial of ‘using a false instrument’, contrary to section 73 of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap.200 (“the Ordinance”). The particulars of the charge was that he had used false instruments which were and which he knew or believed to be false, namely (i) a statement of Chun Wah Shing dated 13 April 2005; (ii) a statement of Lau Siu Ka dated 13 April 2005; and (iii) two entries dated 13 April 2005 in an investigation report, with the intention of inducing Ho Chak Kan
Cited by 1 case