Read the full judgment text of HCA 659/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 August 2007.
1. This is the second time that I have to grant an adjournment for the hearing of the summons due to indisposition of counsel for the Plaintiff. On the last occasion, 4 May 2007, the case was adjourned because counsel, Mr Denis Yu, was indisposed and was unable to file any skeleton argument in time or to argue the case on that day. It transpired that on the last occasion the costs thrown away ordered against the plaintiff were borne personally by Mr Yu and the solicitor for the Plaintiff had w
Cited by 1 case