The Joint & Several Liquidators of Kong Wah Holdings Ltd (in Compulsory Liquidation) v. Kin Yuen

Read the full judgment text of CACV 253/2007 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 2 November 2007.

1. This application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal has been brought on at short notice with the co-operation of the respondents, the liquidators, because the examination which was the subject of the proceedings is due to take place next week.  We have considered the arguments which have been raised this morning.  Effectively, there are no new arguments.  We have dealt with the arguments in our judgment and, simply, there is very little more to be said.  We do not consider that

Case No.CACV 253/2007
Court
Court of Appeal
Date02 Nov 2007
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

cacv 253/2007

in the high court of the

hong kong special administrative region

court of appeal

civil appeal no. 253 of 2007

(on appeal from HCCW NO. 49 of 2000)

______________________

  IN THE MATTER of KONG WAH HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) 
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Section 221 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) 

BETWEEN

  THE JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS
OF KONG WAH HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION)
Applicants
  and  
  KIN YUEN (also known as Respondent
  YUEN KIN, SAMUEL)  

______________________

AND

cacv 254/2007

in the high court of the

hong kong special administrative region

court of appeal

civil appeal no. 254 of 2007

(on appeal from HCCW NO. 50 of 2000)

______________________

  IN THE MATTER of AKAI HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Section 221 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) 

BETWEEN

  THE JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS
OF AKAI HOLDINGS LIMITED
(IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION)
Applicants
  and  
  KIN YUEN (also known as Respondent
  YUEN KIN, SAMUEL)  

______________________

Before : Hon Rogers VP and Le Pichon JA in Court

Date of Hearing : 2 November 2007

Date of Judgment: 2 November 2007

___________________

J U D G M E N T

___________________

Hon Rogers VP:

1.This application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal has been brought on at short notice with the co-operation of the respondents, the liquidators, because the examination which was the subject of the proceedings is due to take place next week.  We have considered the arguments which have been raised this morning.  Effectively, there are no new arguments.  We have dealt with the arguments in our judgment and, simply, there is very little more to be said.  We do not consider that this is a matter of great general or public importance.  We would emphasise that there is no absolute bar to the obtaining of legal advice.  The provision is in the order that the applicant can apply to the person before whom the examination is being conducted to be able to obtain legal advice if he needs to.  But, in other respects, we do not wish to say any more than is already in our judgment. 

2.For these reasons, we would dismiss this application. 

(Discussion re costs)

3.Application dismissed, with costs.

(Anthony Rogers)
Vice-President
(Doreen Le Pichon)
Justice of Appeal

Mr Rimsky Yuen SC, instructed by Messrs Johnson, Stokes & Master, for the Applicants/Respondents

Mr Godfrey Lam, instructed by Messrs Baker & McKenzie, for the Respondent/Applicant