Read the full judgment text of CACC 000609/1983 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. There is a single point to be considered upon this appeal. The appellant was convicted under s.4(2)(a) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, the particulars being that he was alleged to have accepted an advantage, that is the discharge of a loan of $6,000 owed to a man called Luk Tai-chuen as an inducement to or reward for or otherwise on account of his performing an act in his capacity as a public servant, namely arranging for Lam Yan-yee, Lam Tsz-lau and Ip Mei-ching to improperly pass th