Read the full judgment text of FACV 11/2008 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 17 January 2008.
1. In this case I take the unusual course of considering that leave should be given under the provisions of section 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance Cap. 484. In doing so I am fully aware that it is unusual for this court to grant leave under that subsection because the decisions arising under that subsection are primarily matters for the Court of Final Appeal to decide. In addition, the other members of this court are not disposed to grant leave.