Ngan Yu Chiu v. New World First Bus Services Ltd
Read the full judgment text of CACV 122/2007 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 27 November 2007.
1. The last two lines in paragraph 52 should read “that the language of the 1982 section 48 signified that the relevant objection was one made by the employer ”.
Cited by 2 cases
|
CACV 122/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2007 (ON APPEAL FROM HCLA NO. 7 OF 2006) ______________________ BETWEEN
______________________ Before : Hon Tang VP, Cheung JA and Lam J in Court Date of Hearing : 9 November 2007 Date of Judgment : 27 November 2007 Date of Corrigendum : 30 January 2008 _____________________________________ CORRIGENDUM _____________________________________ 1.The last two lines in paragraph 52 should read “that the language of the 1982 section 48 signified that the relevant objection was one made by the employer”. 2.The first three lines of paragraph 72 should read “Section 36A of the Workmen’s Compensation Ordinance 1969 Edition provided that the employer cannot without the consent of the Commissioner terminate the contract until either”.
|
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 122/2007