Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 001654/2007 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 3 March 2008.
1. The Plaintiffs sue the Defendant for repayment of loans. The Defendant says those were gifts. In any event, their action is time-barred. He counterclaims against the 1 st Plaintiff a sum equal to a half-share in a flat. The 1 st Plaintiff says that the Defendant had no interest in the flat.