Read the full judgment text of CACC 000619/2002 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 December 2003.
1. The applicant faced trial in the District Court upon two charges of using a copy of a false instrument, contrary to section 74 of the Crimes Ordinance. The offences were said to have been committed together with one Ho Sui-shing, who was the first defendant at trial (D1). The applicant was the second defendant (D2). Ho did not appear, and so the trial proceeded against the applicant alone. On 22 November 2002 he was convicted on both charges by HH Judge Whaley and sentenced to a term of twent
Cited by 3 cases