Read the full judgment text of CACV 356/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 8 April 2008 before Ma CJHC, Stock JA, Chung J.
Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal – outline zoning plan – de facto deprivation – hope value – economically viable use – relevant considerations – lease modification policy – Court of Appeal refused leave – none of the proposed questions was of great general or public importance – application dismissed with costs
Legal issues: Relevance of hope value in de facto deprivation · Relevance of change in permitted use under lease · Relevance of other possible use under government policy · Relevance of lease restrictions and government discretion
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal refused.
Cited by 1 case