Read the full judgment text of CACV 000164/1986 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The Appellant takes two points. The first is one of law and proceeds on the assumption that the judge's findings of fact were justified and the second is that the judge was wrong to make the findings he did. The action related to a policy of insurance which, as drawn up, covered the risk of injury to eleven men described as “ship building engineers”. The policy expressly excluded “accident occuring whilst the insurance is engaged in …. manual work in connection with the insured's occupation …