BabelCite

厦門新景地集團有限公司 Formerly Known As 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. Eton Properties Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 54/2007 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 24 June 2008 before Hon Reyes J.

This case concerns an application under sections 2GG and 40B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 341) relating to an arbitration award dated 27 October 2006 issued by the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission. The applicants are 厦門新景地集團有限公司 (formerly 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司) while the respondents are Eton Properties Limited (裕景興業有限公司) and Eton Properties (Holdings) Limited (裕景興業(集團)有限公司). The judgment was delivered by Hon Reyes J in chambers on 24 June 2008. The court considered issues related to the enforcement and potential setting aside of the said arbitration award under the relevant provisions of the Arbitration Ordinance. Corrections to minor typographical errors in the original judgment have been issued as of 15 August 2008. No explicit detailed legal issues, factual background, outcomes, or orders are recorded in this judgment extract.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 54/2007
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date24 Jun 2008
JudgeHon Reyes J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 54/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 54 OF 2007

_____________

  IN THE MATTER of Section 2GG and 40B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 341)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of the Arbitration Award dated 27 October 2006 awarded by China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission

_____________

BETWEEN

  厦門新景地集團有限公司
formerly known as
厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司		 Applicant
  and  
  Eton Properties Limited 
(裕景興業有限公司)		 1st Respondent
   Eton Properties (Holdings) Limited
(裕景興業(集團)有限公司)		 2nd Respondent

_____________

Before: Hon Reyes J in Chambers (Not open to public)

Date of Hearing: 19 June 2008

Date of Judgment: 24 June 2008

_______________

CORRIGENDA

_______________

Kindly note the following correction in the Judgment of the above case handed down by the Honourable Mr. Justice Reyes on 24th June, 2008:-

Page 22, paragraph 90, line N, the word “principle” should read as“principles that”.
Page 27, paragraph 103, line between B & C, the word “Land” should read as “Legend”.
Page 31, paragraph 115, line E, the word “ha” should read as “has”.
Page 31, paragraph 115, line G, the word “ha” should read as “has”.
Page 31, paragraph 115, line I, the quotation paragraph number “35.” should read as “36.”.
Page 31, paragraph 115, line between I & J, the word “th” should read as “the”.

Dated this 15th August, 2008.

  (S.C. Cheung)(Miss)
Clerk to Hon Reyes, J

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

厦門新景地集團有限公司 Formerly Known As 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. Eton Properties Ltd and Another
HCCT 54/2007
高等法院原訟法庭
Full analysis
24 Jun 2008
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCCT 54/2007

厦門新景地集團有限公司 Formerly Known As 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. Eton Properties Ltd and Another
高等法院原訟法庭
Full analysis
24 Jun 2008