Robert Lee Flicicinger v. Immigration Department
Read the full judgment text of CACV 52/1987 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. Before we invite Mr. Bunting to open this appeal may we draw attention to a Practice Direction of long standing, part of which reads as follows:
|
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 1987, No. 52 Headnote Appellants in the Court of Appeal reminded of Practice Direction re lodging lists of authorities. (NB. The Direction applies equally to proceedings before the Full Bench or a Judge of the High Court). IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 1987, No. 52 BETWEEN
________________ BETWEEN
_______________ Coram: Hon. Cons, V.-P., Clough, J.A. & Nazareth, J. Date of hearing: 2nd July, 1987. Cons, V.-P.: 1. Before we invite Mr. Bunting to open this appeal may we draw attention to a Practice Direction of long standing, part of which reads as follows:
2. We regret to say that this direction is frequently more honoured in the breach than in the observance. For example, in this very appeal the Respondent's list was not lodged until shortly after lunch yesterday, while the Appellant's list, although that is hardly the right term for it, did not reach my clerk until 4.30 in the afternoon and then only by way of a telephone call. This is simply not good enough. We would like it to be generally noted that an Appellant's solicitors who do not in future comply with the Practice Direction may well find that this division takes the view that the appeal is insufficiently prepared and will adjourn it to another date.
Michael Bunting and Rupert Spicer (M/s Haldane Midgley & Co.) for Appellant/Applicant Bernard Whaley Crown Counsel (Legal Department) for Respondent |
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 52/1987