Robert Lee Flicicinger v. Immigration Department

Read the full judgment text of CACV 52/1987 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.

1. Before we invite Mr. Bunting to open this appeal may we draw attention to a Practice Direction of long standing, part of which reads as follows:

Case No.CACV 52/1987
Court
Court of Appeal
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1987, No. 52
(Civil)

Headnote

Appellants in the Court of Appeal reminded of Practice Direction re lodging lists of authorities.

(NB. The Direction applies equally to proceedings before the Full Bench or a Judge of the High Court).

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1987, No. 52
(Civil)

BETWEEN

IN THE MATTER of an application by Robert Lee Flickinger for an order of certiorari and mandamus

and

IN THE MATTER of the decisions of the Immigration Department dated the 13th January 1987 and the 14th January 1987

________________

BETWEEN

ROBERT LEE FLICICINGER Appellant
(Applicant)
and
IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT Respondent

_______________

Coram: Hon. Cons, V.-P., Clough, J.A. & Nazareth, J.

Date of hearing: 2nd July, 1987.

Cons, V.-P.:

1. Before we invite Mr. Bunting to open this appeal may we draw attention to a Practice Direction of long standing, part of which reads as follows:

"As early as possible before the hearing of proceedings in the Court of Appeal and, in any event, not less than two clear days before the hearing, excluding public holidays, every party or his solicitor must lodge with the Clerk of the Court a list (in triplicate) of the law reports, textbooks and other authorities it is intended to cite."

2. We regret to say that this direction is frequently more honoured in the breach than in the observance. For example, in this very appeal the Respondent's list was not lodged until shortly after lunch yesterday, while the Appellant's list, although that is hardly the right term for it, did not reach my clerk until 4.30 in the afternoon and then only by way of a telephone call. This is simply not good enough. We would like it to be generally noted that an Appellant's solicitors who do not in future comply with the Practice Direction may well find that this division takes the view that the appeal is insufficiently prepared and will adjourn it to another date.

(D. Cons)
Vice-President

(P.G. Clough)
Justice of Appeal

(G.P. Nazareth)
Judge of the High Court

Michael Bunting and Rupert Spicer (M/s Haldane Midgley & Co.) for Appellant/Applicant

Bernard Whaley Crown Counsel (Legal Department) for Respondent

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 52/1987