Read the full judgment text of CACV 203/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 4 September 2008.
1. By judgment dated 7 January 2008, we dismissed this appeal from the dismissal of a judicial review. Despite the failure of the applicant in relation to most of the grounds, we held that the Board had erred in its review of November 2004 but declined relief because there had been a further review in September 2006 where the same error had not been repeated. We determined in the circumstances to make a costs order nisi that there be no order as to costs, save that the applicant’s costs be tax
Cited by 1 case