Tamang Rabichandra v. Vsl Swc (A Firm) and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 659/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 September 2008.

1. Towards the end of paragraph 24, HK$334,125 should read as HK$233,887.50;

Cited by 8 cases

Case No.HCPI 659/2007
Court
High Court CFI
Date22 Sep 2008
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 659/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 659 OF 2007

----------------------

BETWEEN    
  TAMANG RABICHANDRA Plaintiff
  and  
  VSL SWC (a firm) 1st Defendant
  GAMMON-SKANSKA-MBEC JOINT VENTURE 2nd Defendant

---------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

--------------------------------

Kindly note the following amendments in the Judgment handed down on 17 September 2008 by Deputy High Court Judge Harris SC sitting in Court:

1. Towards the end of paragraph 24, HK$334,125 should read as HK$233,887.50;

2. Towards the end of paragraph 25, $183,769 should read as $128,638.13;

3. In paragraph 30,

a)  Loss of earning should read $128,638.13 instead of $183,769;

b)  Sub-total should read $1,048,638.13 instead of $1,103,769; and

c)  Total should read $789,578.13 instead of $844,709.

Dated the 22nd day of September 2008

  (Lau Chi Pang)
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Harris SC

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 659/2007