Read the full judgment text of FACV 000033/2007 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 29 October 2008.
1. This is a case of trespass to which the defence raised is limitation. At the trial, the appellants now before us were the plaintiffs and the respondents now before us were the defendants. It is convenient to refer to the parties as “the plaintiffs” and “the defendants”. I will do so. Shortly stated, the circumstances of the case are as follows.
Cites 1 case