Read the full judgment text of CACV 000152/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 27 October 2008.
1. This is an application for security for costs. The matter is quite simple, from what I can see. The Defendants say that they have a good answer to the Plaintiff’s claim on the basis that the Plaintiff never pleaded an implied licence. All I can say at the moment is that as far as I can see, that is putting the cart before the horse. In other words, it is the wrong person that is supposed to be pleading an implied licence.