Read the full judgment text of CACC 389/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 21 November 2008.
1. The unrepresented applicants, to whom we will refer as D1 and D2 respectively, were jointly charged at trial before Nguyen J and a jury together with D3 to D8, with one count of conspiracy to traffic in dangerous drugs, contrary to sections 4(1)(a), 4(3) and 39 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap.134 and section 159A of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap.200. The prosecution case against D1 was that he was the person in charge of an open-air drug “shop” operating from a market place near a flyover
Cited by 4 cases