Read the full judgment text of FAMC 000061/2008 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 13 January 2009.
1. The applicant was convicted before Deputy District Judge Thomas on three charges of dealing with property known or reasonably believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offence contrary to section 25(1) of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance, Cap 455. On appeal, the Court of Appeal found that there had been a material irregularity involving the Judge’s misunderstanding of an important aspect of the evidence but held that the proviso should be applied.