The New China Hong Kong Group Ltd v. (in Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) and Others v. Ernst & Young (A Firm) and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCCL 41/2004 on BabelCite. This HCCL judgment was delivered on 29 August 2008.

1. Paragraph 51, line L should read “compromising” instead of “comprising”;

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCL 41/2004
Court
HCCL
Date29 Aug 2008
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCL 41/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMMERCIAL ACTION NO. 41 OF 2004 AND 2 OF 2005

----------------------

BETWEEN

  THE NEW CHINA HONG KONG GROUP LIMITED 1st Plaintiff
  (IN CREDITORS' VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION)  
  THE NEW CHINA HONG KONG CAPITAL LIMITED 2nd Plaintiff
  (IN CREDITORS' VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION)  
  THE NEW CHINA HONG KONG FINANCE LIMITED 3rd Plaintiff
  (IN CREDITOR' VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION)  
  and  
  ERNST & YOUNG (a Firm) 1st Defendant
  WU TING YUK ANTHONY 2nd Defendant

----------------------

(Consolidated by the Order of the Honourable Mr Justice Stone dated 16 November 2006)

----------------------

Before: Mr Recorder A Ho SC in Chambers

Dates of Hearing: 21-25 April 2008

Date of Handing Down Decision: 29 August 2008

------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

----------------------

1.Paragraph 51, line L should read “compromising” instead of “comprising”;

2.Paragraph 148, line H should read “clothe” instead of “cloth”.

Dated this 16th day of January 2009

  (D. Chan ) (Ms)
  Clerk to Mr Recorder A Ho SC