Read the full judgment text of HCA 793/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 April 2009.
1. In these proceedings the plaintiffs, (collectively, Sime Winner), sue Mr Tan for breach of fiduciary duty in his capacity as an officer/employee of Sime Winner, and CM2 for breach of fiduciary duty in its capacity as an agent of Sime Winner. Sime Winner seeks to recover from Mr Tan two sums, US$1,463,496.41, and HK$2,348,427, which Sime Winner says were received by CM2 as an agent of Sime Winner. The case for Sime Winner is that Mr Tan misappropriated those sums for himself.
Cited by 4 cases