Read the full judgment text of CACC 235/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 10 February 2009.
1. The applicant was charged with two offences. The first charge (i.e. Charge 1 in the charge sheet) was making a false representation to an immigration assistant lawfully acting under or in the execution of Part II of the Immigration Ordinance, contrary to section 42(1)(a) of the Immigration Ordinance (Cap. 115 of the Laws of Hong Kong). The second charge (i.e. Charge 5 in the charge sheet) was conspiracy to obtain services by deception, contrary to section 18A(1) of the Theft Ordinance (Cap.
Cites 5 cases