Read the full judgment text of DCDT 001769/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 8 May 2009.
1. The Plaintiff was the landlord of a premises (“the Premises”). The Defendant was its tenant. The Defendant used it as an amusement game centre. Up to the end of March 2009, the Defendant had defaulted in payment of rent for HK$125,000. The Plaintiff obtained a warrant of distress under Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance, Cap 7 (“the Ordinance”). In execution of the warrant of distress, the bailiff seized various items of property in the Premises. He drew up an Inventory of th
Cited by 1 case