Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 005561/2006 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 8 May 2009.
1. I shall allow the plaintiff’s summons of 16 December 2008 in the terms set out in the summons. At the hearing, the parties argued on the costs of the amendment. It is clear that the defendants do not object to the plaintiff’s summons of 16 December 2008 that the plaintiff asked for the withdrawal of the earlier summons of 4 August 2007 and further asked for leave to amend the writ of summons and the statement of claim issued on 9 November 2006.