Read the full judgment text of HCAP 8/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 June 2009.
1. In the midst of the trial, the Plaintiff applied for leave to call an additional witness whose identity had previously been withheld. The evidence of the witness is to deal with an event having no direct connection with the facts of this case. Be that as it may, Mr Yu SC contended that the evidence is relevant. The Plaintiff had indicated on 3 April 2009 that the witness would not be called. On 29 May 2009, after the trial has lasted for 9 days, the Plaintiff changed their mind and applie
Cites 2 cases