Dla Piper Hong Kong (A Firm) v. China Property Development (Holdings) Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 2377/2008 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 May 2009.
1. ‘As to the entitlement under the SP Agreement, I cannot and in any case in sufficiently seized with the evidence and arguments to deal it.’ should be changed to ‘As to entitlement under the SP Agreement, I am in sufficiently seized with the evidence and arguments to deal it.’
Cites 1 case
|
HCMP 2377/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 2377 OF 2008 ____________
____________ BETWEEN
____________ Before: Hon Fung J in Chambers Date of Hearing: 16-17 April 2009 Date of Decision: 26 May 2009 ________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Paragraph 55, page 22:- 1. ‘As to the entitlement under the SP Agreement, I cannot and in any case in sufficiently seized with the evidence and arguments to deal it.’ should be changed to ‘As to entitlement under the SP Agreement, I am in sufficiently seized with the evidence and arguments to deal it.’ Dated the 25th day of August 2009.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 2377/2008