Richfine Development Ltd t/a Keng Fai Jewellery v. Hugh Rupert Rivington
Read the full judgment text of FAMV 41/2009 on BabelCite. This Court of Final Appeal judgment was delivered on 21 September 2009 before Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ.
Outcome: Leave to appeal refused.
Cited by 1 case
|
FAMV No. 41 of 2009 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 41 OF 2009 (CIVIL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 257 OF 2008) _____________________ Between:
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ Date of Hearing: 21 September 2009 Date of Determination: 21 September 2009 ______________________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N ______________________________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ : Clearly the claim is unliquidated. No point of law of any controversy or difficulty arises. The Court of Appeal’s decision is correct. No argument to the contrary is reasonable. So, despite the ability with which Ms Eu urged the application for leave, leave is refused.
Ms Audrey Eu SC and Mr Kenny Lin (instructed by Messrs Simon Ho & Co.) for the applicant Mr Robert McLeish (instructed by Messrs DLA Piper Hong Kong) for the respondent |
Other judgments that cite this case