HKSAR v. Lam Wai Keung
|
CACC000729/1997 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL 1997, No.729
------------------------------- Coram: Hon. Power, V.-P. and Stuart-Moore, J.A. Date of Hearing: 2 April 1998 Date of Judgment: 2 April 1998 ---------------------- J U D G M E N T ---------------------- Power, V.-P. (giving the judgment of the Court): 1. This applicant pleaded guilty before Saied J. to one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug, a count of manufacturing was left on the file. 2. The count to which he pleaded alleged that on 13th July 1996 at Flat B, 13th floor, Wing Lam Mansion, San Lau Street, Hunghom, he trafficked in a dangerous drug, namely 1,461.05 grammes of a mixture containing 915.95 grammes of heroin hydrochloride. The quantity of the narcotic content was therefore well under 1,000 grammes. 3. The facts were all too familiar ones. The applicant was stopped and taken to his premises which were searched and, as set out in the Summary of Facts, the following occurred. The police found three half-unit blocks of heroin together with some equipment and chemicals capable for adulterating high grade heroin into lower grade heroin. The defendant was immediately cautioned and arrested in relation to the dangerous drugs found inside the premises. The defendant then voluntarily surrendered a half-unit block of heroin from the waistband of his trousers. The dangerous drugs seized from the defendant and from inside the premises was sent to Dr. Poon for analysis. The half-unit block found in the defendant's possession was 346.54 grammes of a mixture containing 232.33 grammes of heroin hydrochloride. In respect of the dangerous drugs found inside the premises, the total was 1,114 grammes of a mixture containing 683.62 grammes of heroin hydrochloride. The retail value of the drugs was $1.139m. 4. The trial judge when sentencing said:
5. While we agree with much that has fallen from the judge, we are not persuaded that the proper starting point was one of 25 years. He was not convicted of manufacturing, that charge was left on the file. He was convicted of the offence of trafficking and the amount involved was under 1,000 grammes. We are satisfied that a proper starting point would have been 22 years. We accept that he had not only pleaded but also co-operated with the police and we are prepared to allow the discount which the judge thought was appropriate. This will reduce the sentence to one of 12 years. 6. The hearing of the application is treated as the hearing of the appeal. The appeal is allowed and the sentence is reduced accordingly.
Representation: Mr. Veltro, S.G.C. (D.P.P.) for the Respondent Applicant in person. |