HKSAR v. Wong Chi Kwong

Case No.HCCC 238/2009
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Sep 2009
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCCC238/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 238 OF 2009

-----------------

  HKSAR  
  v.  
  WONG CHI-KWONG  

-----------------

Before:

Deputy High Court Judge M Poon

Date:

11 September 2009 at 9.43 am

Present:

Miss Laura Ng, SPP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Mr Caesar Lo, instructed by Messrs Haldanes, for the Accused

Offence:

Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

------------------------------------------

Transcript of the Audio Recording

of the Sentence in the above Case

------------------------------------------

COURT: The defendant pleads guilty to one charge of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to section 4(1)(a) and (3) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 134.

Defendant was intercepted by police officers at the Lo Wu Immigration Control Point upon his arrival from China. Five packets of heroin were found inside the defendant’s waist bag. He told officers, under caution, that he conveyed the drugs for someone, with a reward of $400 per packet. Upon analysis, the drugs were found to be 141.11 grammes of a powder containing 90.51 grammes of heroin hydrochloride. The market value of the drugs at the time was around $69,000-odd.

The defendant has 28 previous convictions, 14 of which are drug related. Three are similar to the present offence. His last conviction was 5 July 2006 for an offence of trafficking in dangerous drugs and possession of dangerous drugs. He was sentenced concurrently to the DATC.

By way of mitigation, I was told that the defendant is now aged 53, married, and wife and children are living currently in China. It is said that at the time of the offence he was relying on public assistance. Counsel asked me to take into account his timely plea of guilty which shows his genuine remorse. It is further said that he has been a drug abuser for over 30 years, and in this case he has been recruited as a foot soldier to deliver drugs for just $2,000 to feed his own addiction.

Counsel urged me to exercise leniency in sentencing him so as to enable him to reunite with his family as early as possible.

In sentencing him I have considered his guilty plea, mitigation forwarded by counsel on his behalf, and the existing tariff for trafficking in heroin.

For trafficking in narcotics between 50 to 200 grammes the tariff is one of between 8 to 12 years’ imprisonment. Taking into account the narcotics in the present case, I adopt a starting point of 9½ years’ imprisonment. I shall give him the full one-third discount for his guilty plea. He is sentenced to 76 months’ imprisonment.