China Merchants Kin Swiss Transportation Co Ltd and Another v. Treasure Wise Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 344/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 November 2009.

1. On 3 November 2009 I dismissed the plaintiffs’ application with costs to the 1 st defendant (“ D1 ”). Directions were given for written submissions to be made regarding (a) the basis of taxation, (b) certificate for two counsel, (c) summary assessment pursuant to RHC Ord. 62 r. 9A(1)(a), and (d) set-off of those costs against other costs.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 344/2007
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Nov 2009
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 344/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 344 OF 2007

____________

BETWEEN

  CHINA MERCHANTS KIN SWISS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY LIMITED 1st Plaintiff
  ORIENTURE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 2nd Plaintiff
  and  
  TREASURE WISE LIMITED 1st Defendant
  LUEN FAT TANNERY LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  LUEN TAI LEATHER COMPANY LIMITED 3rd Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Chung J in Chambers

Dates of Hearing:  10 September and 3 November 2009

Date of Last Written Submissions:  11 November 2009

Date of Handing Down Decision on Costs and Summary Assessment: 18 November 2009

________________________________________________

DECISION ON COSTS AND SUMMARY ASSESSMENT

________________________________________________

1.On 3 November 2009 I dismissed the plaintiffs’ application with costs to the 1st defendant (“D1”). Directions were given for written submissions to be made regarding (a) the basis of taxation, (b) certificate for two counsel, (c) summary assessment pursuant to RHC Ord. 62 r. 9A(1)(a), and (d) set-off of those costs against other costs.

2.Having perused the parties’ written submissions, I decide that:-

(1)  those costs should be assessed on party-and-party basis;

(2)  the hearing is certified fit for court attendance by two counsel;

(3)  those costs be set-off against the amount of costs taxable and payable by D1 pursuant to the costs order dated 20 November 2008.

3.In relation to the summary assessment of the items in D1’s statement of costs dated 9 November 2009:-

(a)  $462 be allowed for category B;

(b)  $35,000 be allowed for category C;

(c)  $30,000 be allowed for category D;

(d)  $140,000 be allowed for category E;

(e)  $4,800 be allowed for category F.

  (Andrew Chung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Patrick Fung, SC, instructed by Messrs Wilkinson & Grist, for the Plaintiffs

Ms Audrey Eu, SC leading Mr Willard Li, instructed by Messrs Kao, Lee & Yip, for the 1st Defendant