Read the full judgment text of DCCC 000825/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The defendant faces one charge of wounding with intent contrary to s.17 of the Offences Against the Person Ordinance, Cap.212, and one charge of wounding contrary to s.19 of the same Ordinance. The defendant at first pleaded not guilty to both charges and since the prosecution based their case solely on the cautioned statements of the defendant, a voir dire was held to determine the admissibility of the statement. Upon my ruling that the defendant had voluntarily taken part in the interview a
Cites 1 case