HKSAR v. Abbas Syed Nadeem

Defendant\

Case No.DCCC 842/2009

Court

District Court

Date11 Dec 2009

Judge—

Case Document

100%

DCCC842/2009

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 842 OF 2009

----------------------

	HKSAR
	v.
	Abbas Syed Nadeem

----------------------

Before:

H H Judge Yung

Date:

11 December 2009 at 4.12 pm

Present:

Mr Edward Laskey, Counsel on fiat, for HKSAR
Mr Hoosen Abdul Aziz, instructed by Norman M.K. Yeung & Co., for the Defendant

Offence:

Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

---------------------------------

Reasons for Sentence

---------------------------------

1.When it comes to sentence the Court of Appeal lay down very strict guidelines. I think in this case converting the quantity of cannabis to equivalent quantity of ketamine is a futile exercise. Looking at the quantity of ketamine you had in your possession I think the extra quantity of cannabis should not have significantly increased the sentence. I can safely ignore that quantity of cannabis for the purpose of sentencing. Of course the Court of Appeal never intended a straight line sliding scale quantity in the band of sentences otherwise it would have spelt it out easily. A certain logarithm table would have been laid down for the court to resort to.

2.Looking at the quantity, a sentence should be close to the upper end. The mode of trafficking is just an average type. Nothing to show it is more serious, nothing to show you play a very serious or a particularly significant part. The sentences should be relating mostly to the quantity you had.

3.I think a term of 5½ years’ imprisonment should be the starting point. There are no other mitigating factors in your case apart from your own personal circumstances. Of course I am not condoning what you did but I do appreciate that it was particularly hard for you. Even if you wanted to work illegally you cannot find work or at least you would have had difficulty in finding an employer who is willing to employ you at the risk of being sent to prison themselves. And, I understand, from other cases, and I am sure it applies in your case, no other meaningful activity had been organised for you and persons in a situation similar to yours. So you are simply let go, free in the street without any money to spend; without any chance of earning a decent living.

4.I do appreciate the difficulty you have. I will give you some credit for that and I also consider that you are a foreigner and you are a refugee and there may be quite significant Punjabi speaking prison population. I do not know. But in any event they may be of a different culture, you are a newcomer here, prison life will be more difficult for you and I understand that there are certain remission should be given in respect of that. So altogether I will give you another 6 months reduction so that I will sentence you to a total term of 5 years’ imprisonment.

H H Judge Yung
District Judge

Defendant's renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused by Court of Appeal. Please refer to CACC451/2009 dated 25 March 2011