HKSAR v. Wan Lan Way
|
HCCC208/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CRIMINAL CASE NO. 208 OF 2008 ----------------------
----------------------
COURT: Defendant, you were convicted on your own plea of a charge of trafficking in dangerous drugs, namely, 21.49 grammes of a crystalline solid containing 21.27 grammes of methamphetamine hydrochloride, commonly known as “Ice”. The facts reveal that you were an actual trafficker. You sold drugs to an undercover police officer for $4,900. In the course of the transaction, you produced a small electronic scale and weighed the drugs which you took out from your trousers pocket. The reading of the scale showed that the drugs weighed 15 grammes. However, on analysis by the Government Chemist, the drugs in question were found to be of a larger quantity than intended between the parties. This is a factor I will bear in mind in the adoption of the starting point for sentence. Furthermore, you have made admissions to the police under the video camera after your arrest. I think, to some extent, it shows that you were remorseful for your conduct. Your personal background perhaps is not very usual for convicted persons of this type. You are now aged 36. You were born in the United Kingdom. You were educated up to Form 7 level in the UK. You previously worked as a cook, as I understand it, a survey assistant, supermarket supervisor in both Park’N Shop and Pokka, and also a part-time tutor. In the United Kingdom, you were divorced with no children. In Hong Kong, you had been, before your arrest, cohabiting with a girlfriend Loretta who has a young child whom, as I understand it this morning, you have been responsible for maintaining. You have a number of convictions and they are mostly drug-related offences. The quantity of drugs in question is 21.27 grammes of “Ice”. I have consulted the leading sentencing case of Ching Kwok Hung [1991] 2 HKLR at page 125. For the reasons I earlier mentioned, because the actual quantity that was sold exceeded the quantity that was contemplated by you and your supplier, I adopt a starting point of 7 years. Given the fact that you have pleaded guilty, I have to give you the customary one-third discount and that shall bring the sentence to 4 years and 8 months. There are however special circumstances, on the papers, which justify a lenient view to be taken of the facts. I will further reduce the sentence by 1 year. You will go to prison for 3 years and 8 months. |