Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 4077/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 5 March 2010.
1. The question for me to decide today in relation to the summons taken out by the Defendant for leave to execute against two partners of the Plaintiff firm is, now that the Plaintiff has paid the sum of $50,000 which had earlier been ordered to be the costs of the previous hearing for the Order 14 application, whether the Defendant should have taken out the summons for leave to execute in relation to that sum against the individual partners of the plaintiff’s firm, namely Dr Fenn and a Mr Tse.