Read the full judgment text of CACC 000776/1973 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. This is an application to call fresh evidence on appeal. The charge was one of keeping a brothel and the Appellant was convicted on the evidence of police witnesses who went to the premises. The defence was that the Appellant was not the person having the apparent management of the premises at the time the police carried out their raid. It was alleged by the defence that one Suen was the proprietor of the establishment. No other name was mentioned in the course of the trial. It was suggested