Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 6778/2002 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 March 2010.
1. Having heard the parties, I am satisfied that the tape for which discovery is sought is relevant in the Peruvian Guano sense to whether or not there was an agreement to sell all the 3,000 shares on 3 November 2000, or to the parties’ understanding of an ‘or better’ order.