Read the full judgment text of CACC 302/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 31 March 2010.
1. I have had the advantage of reading in draft the judgments of Hartmann JA and Wright J. I agree with them save that insofar as they differ as to the appropriate disposal of the applications of the 4 th applicant, Fan, I agree with the judgment of Hartmann JA, for the reasons which he gives, and not with the judgment of Wright J. I also agree with both judges that notwithstanding the errors identified in relation to the application of co-conspirator’s rule and the failure to identify all doc
Cites 1 case