Read the full judgment text of FACV 15/2009 on BabelCite. This Court of Final Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 April 2010 before Bokhary PJ, Chan PJ, Ribeiro PJ, Mortimer NPJ, Lord Millett NPJ.
1. This appeal comes here by way of leave granted under s.22(1)(a) of the Court’s statute. In other words, it was leave based on the amount of money involved. There was no leave under the “point of law” limb or under the “or otherwise” limb of s.22(1)(b). The appeal consists of an attack on concurrent findings of fact. It consists of nothing else. The Court’s well-known practice is not to review concurrent findings of fact save in special circumstances. A litigant who takes up the Court’s
Outcome: Appeal dismissed with costs.