Read the full judgment text of CACV 101/2007 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 23 April 2010.
1. The plaintiffs were the sole agent of the 1 st defendant’s product in Shanghai. The major issue at trial was whether the agency was for 4 years (3+1) or 50 years. Another area of dispute is whether the agency agreement was made with the 1 st defendant, or the 1 st defendant’s wholly-owned subsidiary in Hong Kong.
Cited by 10 cases