Parkmost Ltd v. Wong Yeung on and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACV 383/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 5 May 2010.
1. CACV 383/2008 arose out of Master Hui’s order made on 4 March 2008 for vacant possession against the defendants on the plaintiff’s application for summary judgment.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
CACV 383/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 383 OF 2008 (ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 1193 OF 2006) ----------------------
---------------------- Before: Hon Tang VP, Cheung JA and Kwan JA in Court Date of Hearing: 5 May 2010 Date of Decision: 5 May 2010 ---------------------- DECISION ---------------------- Hon Tang VP (giving the decision of the Court): 1.CACV 383/2008 arose out of Master Hui’s order made on 4 March 2008 for vacant possession against the defendants on the plaintiff’s application for summary judgment. 2.The defendants’ appeal from Master Hui’s order was dismissed by Deputy Judge L Chan on 1 December 2008. 3.The appeal to us from the learned Deputy Judge L Chan’s decision was dismissed by us on 18 February 2010. 4.The defendants now apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. 5.Since we are concerned with an interlocutory judgment for that (See: Onway Engineering Ltd v. Shun Wing Construction & Engineering Co Ltd, FAMV 18/2009 (unreported, dated 14 September 2009), section 22 (1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484 must be satisfied. 6.No question of great general or public importance is involved and we can see no other reason for leave to be granted. 7.So leave to appeal is refused.
The Defendant, in person, present. Mr Alvin Tsang, instructed by Messrs Dundons, for the Plaintiff. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 383/2008